Davidson, Radical interpretation

- How does Davidson show that traditional accounts of meaning have failed?
- What are the desiderata for a theory of interpretation?
- Why is Quine's method of translation inadequate for a theory of meaning? 
- How does Davidson respond to the objection that we have to interpret reference relation before we can use a theory of truth? Why is this an objection to his view in the first place?
- What is the fundamental piece of evidence that a theory of interpretation should use?
- How does Davidson deal with the objection that some T-sentences may be `anomalous'? What is the difficulty there in the first place?

Davidson, Reality without reference

- What is the explanatory role of the satisfaction relation?
- Why should Convention T be accepted even though it does not explicated the concept of truth?
- Why can't we give a theory of meaning based on the fully explicated reference relation?
- How can the context principle help us to defend a theory of meaning that does not explicate reference?
- What is Davidson's holistic proposal for a theory of meaning?